The academic journal looked into
twenty-nine studies performed by various researchers. The studies were
performed to see if there’s a connection between athletes’ nutrition knowledge
and the impact of nutrition education on their dietary behavior (Heaney,
O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton 248-59). The studies considered
coaches, athletic trainers, sport dietitians, nutritionists, and medical
practitioners all forms of “nutrition-education” (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael,
Gifford, and Naughton 248-59).
Image provided by Elana's Pantry http://www.flickr.com/photos/elanaspantry/5693419651/ |
All of the studies were performed on
people of different ages, genders, and race and even on different types of
athletes; elite verse recreational (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and
Naughton 248-59). The journal selected a wide variety of studies in order to
have a good range of information to back their claim. The Researches from the
studies reported nutritional knowledge as a quantitative score (Heaney,
O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton 248-59). They also recorded dietary
intake of the athletes by dietary analysis and by the number of servings of
food groups (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton 248-59). The
researchers also used non athletes as controls (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael,
Gifford, and Naughton 248-59).
The Journal found that only three out
of the twenty-nine studies reported that elite competitive athletes scored
significantly higher on the nutrition-knowledge instrument than the comparison
group (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton 248-59). These studied
were performed on age-matched participants undertaking less than three hours of
physical activity a week (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton
248-59). Unfortunately only seven out of the twenty-nine studies had a
non-athlete control group (Heaney, O'Connor, Michael, Gifford, and Naughton
248-59). In the end, the journal was not able to conclude whether healthier or
more optimal dietary intake was associated with the level of nutrition
knowledge, because there isn’t enough evidence to prove this (Heaney, O'Connor,
Michael, Gifford, and Naughton 248-59).
How can the findings of this academic
journal apply to your life? Well, if you’re an athlete like me and can
sometimes assume your diet is healthy because you’re an athlete you’re most
likely wrong. There is no evidence to prove an athlete’s diet is healthier than
a non-athlete. What you can do to make sure your diet is optimal for your life
and your sport is talk to your doctor and ask what kinds of food you should be
eating and what foods you should avoid. A nutritionist is also someone who can
help you have a proper diet. A healthy diet is crucial for athletes and
non-athletes alike. Whether you’re reaching for the Olympics or living life
day-today.
Work Citied:
Heaney, Susan, Helen O'Connor, Scott
Michael, Janelle Gifford, and Geraldine Naughton. "Nutrition Knowledge in
Athletes: A Systematic Review." International Journal of Sport
Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 21. (2011): 248-59. Web. 22 Sep. 2011.
<http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=2&hid=106&sid=1fc2d127-bc6e-4139-b391-6e6731c3ae5a%40sessionmgr112>.
No comments:
Post a Comment